 Visning av honnørposter for Apelars!
|
|
Sider: 1 ... 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 ... 26
|
|
121
|
Kosthold / Kosttilskudd / Sv: Fikk lymfekreft av proteinpulver
|
25. Januar 2009, 16:52
|
Høy trollfaktor her, men alikevel:
Proteinpulver er ett næringskonsentrat. Det er ikke "kunstig" fremstillt. Myseprotein er f eks et overskuddsprodukt fra osteproduksjon. Man får kjøpt myseproteinpulver i store sekker fra Tine, og eggeproteinpulver fra Prior.
Man finner proteinpulver i bla morsmelkerstattning, næringsdrikker og barnegrøt. Hadde det vært en sammenheng mellom bruk av disse produktene og kreft, så hadde sammenhengen vært klar for lenge siden.
Ingen trenger proteinpulver, man klarer seg utmerket godt på vanlige proteinkilder.
Men det er lang vei fra unødvendig til skadelig.
I mange tilfeller er kosttilskudd overpriset, men som ren proteinkilde er et høyproteintilskudd en lant billigere proteinkilde en f eks kyllingkjøtt. Lettvint å få i seg er det også.
Er vitamintilskudd skadelig? Nei. Er det nødvendig? I de aller fleste tilfeller: nei.
Er omega3 tilskudd skadelig? Nei. Er det nødvendig? Om man spiser mye fet fisk: nei.
Osv osv..
Jeg er fullstendig enig i at kosttilskuddbransjen selger mye overprisede produkter som fungerer dårlig eller ikke i det hele tatt.
Selv bruker jeg sjelden noen form for tilskudd da jeg setter mer pris på å innta mine kalorier i form av velsmakende mat fremfor hubbabubbasmakende pulver. Fremgang er avhengig av andre ting en tilskuddbruk.
Men det gjelder å skille snørr fra barter her, og at en lege skal ha uttalt at noen har fått kreft som en følge av bruk av proteintilskudd, det finner jeg helt usannsynlig.
Om det alikevel skulle stemme, så har han ikke noe belegg for å hevde dette. |
| Honnør gitt av : Mr Melk, 25. Januar 2009, 16:58
|
|
|
122
|
Kosthold / Kosttilskudd / Sv: Fikk lymfekreft av proteinpulver
|
25. Januar 2009, 16:52
|
Høy trollfaktor her, men alikevel:
Proteinpulver er ett næringskonsentrat. Det er ikke "kunstig" fremstillt. Myseprotein er f eks et overskuddsprodukt fra osteproduksjon. Man får kjøpt myseproteinpulver i store sekker fra Tine, og eggeproteinpulver fra Prior.
Man finner proteinpulver i bla morsmelkerstattning, næringsdrikker og barnegrøt. Hadde det vært en sammenheng mellom bruk av disse produktene og kreft, så hadde sammenhengen vært klar for lenge siden.
Ingen trenger proteinpulver, man klarer seg utmerket godt på vanlige proteinkilder.
Men det er lang vei fra unødvendig til skadelig.
I mange tilfeller er kosttilskudd overpriset, men som ren proteinkilde er et høyproteintilskudd en lant billigere proteinkilde en f eks kyllingkjøtt. Lettvint å få i seg er det også.
Er vitamintilskudd skadelig? Nei. Er det nødvendig? I de aller fleste tilfeller: nei.
Er omega3 tilskudd skadelig? Nei. Er det nødvendig? Om man spiser mye fet fisk: nei.
Osv osv..
Jeg er fullstendig enig i at kosttilskuddbransjen selger mye overprisede produkter som fungerer dårlig eller ikke i det hele tatt.
Selv bruker jeg sjelden noen form for tilskudd da jeg setter mer pris på å innta mine kalorier i form av velsmakende mat fremfor hubbabubbasmakende pulver. Fremgang er avhengig av andre ting en tilskuddbruk.
Men det gjelder å skille snørr fra barter her, og at en lege skal ha uttalt at noen har fått kreft som en følge av bruk av proteintilskudd, det finner jeg helt usannsynlig.
Om det alikevel skulle stemme, så har han ikke noe belegg for å hevde dette. |
| Honnør gitt av : Iceberg, 25. Januar 2009, 16:54
|
|
|
126
|
Generelt / Ã…pent forum / Sv: allmektig Gud
|
20. Januar 2009, 13:43
|
Denne var så genial att den passer her:
HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
You gotta love this guys explanation of Hell...The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term.
The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well:
Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities: 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct......leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."
This Student Received The Only "A".
 |
| Honnør gitt av : SilverFox, 21. Januar 2009, 08:02
|
|
|
127
|
Generelt / Ã…pent forum / Sv: allmektig Gud
|
20. Januar 2009, 13:43
|
Denne var så genial att den passer her:
HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
You gotta love this guys explanation of Hell...The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term.
The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well:
Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities: 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct......leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."
This Student Received The Only "A".
|
| Honnør gitt av : ¤MadAss¤, 21. Januar 2009, 01:38
|
|
|
128
|
Generelt / Ã…pent forum / Sv: allmektig Gud
|
20. Januar 2009, 13:43
|
Denne var så genial att den passer her:
HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
You gotta love this guys explanation of Hell...The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term.
The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well:
Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities: 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct......leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."
This Student Received The Only "A".
|
| Honnør gitt av : Burrhus, 20. Januar 2009, 18:17
|
|
|
129
|
Generelt / Ã…pent forum / Sv: allmektig Gud
|
20. Januar 2009, 13:43
|
Denne var så genial att den passer her:
HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
You gotta love this guys explanation of Hell...The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term.
The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well:
Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities: 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct......leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."
This Student Received The Only "A".
|
| Honnør gitt av : kenboy, 20. Januar 2009, 17:03
|
|
|
130
|
Generelt / Ã…pent forum / Sv: allmektig Gud
|
20. Januar 2009, 13:43
|
Denne var så genial att den passer her:
HELL EXPLAINED BY CHEMISTRY STUDENT
You gotta love this guys explanation of Hell...The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term.
The answer by one student was so "profound" that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well:
Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?
Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.
One student, however, wrote the following:
First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.
As for how many souls are entering Hell, let's look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.
This gives two possibilities: 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, "It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct......leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting "Oh my God."
This Student Received The Only "A".
|
| Honnør gitt av : Mummelmann, 20. Januar 2009, 14:43
|
|
|
131
|
Kosthold / Kosthold og Ernæring / Sv: Lena Alexandra sitt kosthold=) kommentar?
|
16. Januar 2009, 14:55
|
Hehe, spennende vinkling: Hvis man er uenig, bør man la være å delta i diskusjonen.
For all del, drit i helseaspektet og de langsiktige konsekvense!
Who cares?
Tenner du på dette ?:
I så fall er kanskje ikke dette forumet for deg?
Her handler det om muskler, helse og prestasjoner..... |
| Honnør gitt av : Mr Melk, 16. Januar 2009, 20:18
|
|
|
132
|
Kosthold / Kosthold og Ernæring / Sv: Lena Alexandra sitt kosthold=) kommentar?
|
16. Januar 2009, 14:55
|
Hehe, spennende vinkling: Hvis man er uenig, bør man la være å delta i diskusjonen.
For all del, drit i helseaspektet og de langsiktige konsekvense!
Who cares?
Tenner du på dette ?:
I så fall er kanskje ikke dette forumet for deg?
Her handler det om muskler, helse og prestasjoner..... |
| Honnør gitt av : Mummelmann, 16. Januar 2009, 15:41
|
|
|
133
|
Generelt / Ã…pent forum / Sv: allmektig Gud
|
16. Januar 2009, 02:11
|
En placebokontrollert studie om helbredelse kunne f eks vært no ala:
100 pasienter med pancreaskreft (5 års overlevelsesrate på 5%).
50 pasienter blir forsøkt helbredet. (Disse må da være personlig kristene)
50 pasienter i en kontrollgruppe.
Begge gruppene mottar den samme formen for medisinsk behandling (cellegift og strålingsterapi)
Etter 5 år sammenlikner man gruppene.
Om det er større andel overlevende i helbredelsesgruppen, har man ett statistisk signifikant svar på att helbredelse fungerer.
Hvorfor osv, sier det ingenting om, men det er uansett ikke mulig å komme frem til.
Det er ikke vanskelig å kontrollere, man må bare ha en homogen pasientgruppe (de må ha samme type sykdom) og kontroll over hva salgs terapi som blir gitt.
Jo større pasientpopulasjon som blir undersøkt (altså bedre med 1000 enn med 100 personer) desto større nøyaktighet og tyngde har resultatet.
|
| Honnør gitt av : Mummelmann, 16. Januar 2009, 13:30
|
|
|
134
|
Generelt / Antidoping / Sv: Dopingring avslørt
|
12. Januar 2009, 13:21
|
Jeg vet! Spørs om det ikke blir lenger tiss på alle gutta og!
Det hadde jeg likt!!
Good for you! |
| Honnør gitt av : Geir M, 16. Januar 2009, 01:08
|
|
|
135
|
Generelt / Ã…pent forum / Sv: allmektig Gud
|
15. Januar 2009, 10:44
|
Vitenskapen kan forklare at en person som var syk er blitt frisk, men den sier ikke nødvendigvis at det var Gud som gjorde det. Du ser jo selv hva kritikerne sier det er: "Placebo", "tilfeldig"... Har jo før gitt flere linker der folk står fram med fullt navn og bilde og påstår de er helbredet. Det er fullt mulig å sjekke disse opp. Angående historiske hendelser er jo bibelsk arkeologi et interessant område. Er jo bare å sjekke ut...
Placebo er ikke vanskelig å kontrollere effekten av i kliniske studier.
I all høykvalitativ medisinsk forskning har man metoder for å måle dette.
Hadde man ikke det, så hadde det vært umulig å si noe som helst om virkningen til ulike behandlingsmetoder.
Bibelsk arkeologi er interessant som fenomen ja, bare synd de ikke har fått utrettet så mye i alle de årene har holdt på med å f eks grave etter noahs ark... Bortsett fra å grave mange hull da  |
| Honnør gitt av : Mummelmann, 15. Januar 2009, 11:40
|
|
|
