Treningsforum

Jeg går på Atkins dietten, og har fått en del "spørsmål"/"tvil" fra Cain.... på en annen tråd.   Starter derfor denne.
Jeg kan iallefall starte med hvorfor jeg går på dietten.
For ca ett og et halvt år siden veide jeg 89kg, prøvde dietten i 7mnd, og tapte 19kg... Det samme gjorde samboeren min Bad-2-da-b1...
Nå går begge to på den igjen og det funker kjempefint for oss begge to...og mange andre...
se feks. på JohnBlond.........BADDADING, BADDADANG.... :erter:

ow-carbohydrate diets have been the subject of heated debate in medical circles for three decades [1]. They are still controversial and only recently has any serious research supported some aspects of Atkins' claims, especially for short-term weight-loss (6 months or less).


But the broader consensus of the scientific community also raises serious concerns:

The National Weight Control Registry, funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) tracked the habits of successful dieters over a longer term, 10 years. Despite this diet's overwhelming popularity compared to other diets, of the 5,000 Americans confirmed to have lost an average of 70 pounds and able to prove they have kept it off for at least 6 years of the decade of NIH’s data-keeping, less than 1% were confirmed to be Atkins adherents.


Even in studies only one year long, this diet can fail to produce the greater weight-loss which is claimed to come from factors other than calorie-reduction such as ketosis: It was compared to dieters on Dean Ornish’s diet, Weight Watchers, and The Zone Diet for 1 year. The Atkins Diet came last in terms of weight lost at the end of the year. (Dansinger, M.L., Gleason, J. L., Griffith, J.L., et al., "One Year Effectiveness of the Atkins, Ornish, Weight Watchers, and Zone Diets in Decreasing Body Weight and Heart Disease Risk", Presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions November 12, 2003 in Orlando, Florida.)


The May 2004 Annals of Internal Medicine study showed that Atkins Dieters had significantly more diarrhea, general weakness, rashes and muscle cramps. Atkins.com now suggests a fiber supplement.


Also, acidity from the typically high protein intake can cause osteoporosis (Feskanich D, Willett WC, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA. Milk, dietary calcium, and bone fractures in women: a 12-year prospective study. Amer Jrnl Public Health 1997;87:992-7. See also follow-up in February, 2003 issue of the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (Vol. 77, No. 2, 504-511); this includes 72,000+ people and 18 years of data. Cumming RG, Klineberg RJ. Case-control study of risk factors for hip fractures in the elderly. Amer Jrnl Epidemiology 1994;139:493-503.



With its emphasis on fatty foods, the Atkins diet has generally been considered by most medical and nutritional experts to be unsound. It also violates the food pyramid, which states that amounts of carbohydrates, protein and fats (in that order) must be regularly consumed to stay healthy. Some experts have even suggested Atkins' plan is quackery. Among those criticizing the healthiness of his diet, if not also skeptical of the claims of greater weight-loss than other, safer diets, are such reputable organizations as:


a. “...the Atkins diet, as recommended, poses a serious threat to health.” --Chair of the American Medical Association's Council on Food and Nutrition, testimony to Congress


b. "unhealthy and can be dangerous." --C. Everett Koop (Shape Up America! news release, 29 December 2003)


c. "a nightmare of a diet." --Journal of the American Dietetic Association 102 (2002): p.260


d. Also condemned by National Institutes of Health in NIH Publ. No. 94-3700, 1993.


e. Condemned by ACS in American Cancer Society; Weighing In on Low Carb Diets, 2004.


f. Condemned by the American Kidney Fund in American Kidney Fund news release, 25 April 2002.


g. Condemned by American Heart Association in Circulation 104 (2001): p.1869.


h. Condemned by Johns Hopkins in Diabetes 2004. Johns Hopkins University White Paper, 2004


i. Condemned by the American College of Sports Medicine in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 33 (2001): p.2145.


j. Expressing a general sentiment was the conclusion: “runs counter to all the current evidence-based dietary recommendations.” --Journal of the American College of Cardiology 43 (2004): p.725


Opponents of the diet also point out that the initial weight loss upon starting the diet is a phenomenon common with most diets, and is due to reduction in stored glycogen and related water in muscles, not fat loss. They claim that no evidence has surfaced that any diet will cause weight loss unless it reduces food energy below the maintenance level, and reports have indicated that successful weight loss due to the Atkins diet may be the result of less food energy being consumed by the dieter, rather than the lack of carbohydrates. [2] They further point out that weight loss on fad diets, which typically restrict or prohibit certain foods, is often due to the fact that the dieter has less food choices available. Also, a diet of low-carb foods may quickly become dull to many people, meaning that their appetite is somewhat naturally suppressed as they become hungry for carbs, but the dieter either has none handy or resists this hunger.


There is also bad breath and fatigue, which are only the milder symptoms of the purposefully-induced ketosis, yet Atkins accuses other diets of causing fatigue: [3], [4], and Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine 68(2001): p.761


In addition, Atkins' claims that high carbohydrate diets cause obesity are contradicted by the fact that societies which treat carbohydrates as a staple, in particular countries in East Asia such as Japan, China and Thailand, where rice is often consumed at each meal and drinks and snacks are also made from the grain, often have remarkably low rates of obesity. However, given other factors, such as an increase in sedentary recreational and work activities over these decades, there is only correlation between this higher-calorie diet and the rise in obesity, but no conclusive, causal relationship between any diet and America's obesity; one can even turn Dr. Atkins' spurious (not supported by the data) correlative argument against the Atkins Diet itself, by pointing out that this obesity rose in concert not with higher carbs and lower fat, but it HAS risen as low-carb diets were created, and got worse as they got more popular.


On May 27, 2004, Jody Gorran, a 53-year-old Florida businessman, filed a lawsuit against Atkins Nutritionals, Inc. and the estate of Dr. Robert Atkins, claiming that the Atkins diet regimen caused severe heart disease, making it necessary for him to undergo angioplasty. As of May 28, he has been seeking a court injunction banning Atkins Nutritionals from marketing its products without a warning of potential health risks, and asking for compensatory damages.


Dr. Robert Eckel of the American Heart Association says that high-protein, low-carbohydrate diets put people at risk for heart disease. [5]


Users of the diet must exercise significant caution when manipulating their body's natural metabolic state.


It should also be noted that for individuals who participate in sports, this diet is not good. Athletes require carbohydrates as they are easiest for the body to utilize for energy (ATP). Fats must be beta-oxidized, but this requires extra oxygen, reducing the advantage of a high VO2 Max. Less oxygen is going into making energy, some is going into a conversion instead. Protein nucleotides can also be used to directly synthesize ATP, but at this stage, the free fats and carbohydrates stored within muscles have been depleted. This can result in an athlete "bonking" and suffering from very low performance.

Var dette det eneste du hadde å  vise til...?

Dietten funker for meg og mange andre... jeg bruker den nå for å komme ned i  fettprosent, for deretter å trene meg større, strammere og ikke minst sterkere.
Har ingen planer om å følge dietten i 10 år, men til målet mitt er nådd, deretter kommer jeg til å sette opp et nytt og nøye gjennomtenkt kosthold.

Hvis du vil følge fremgangen min, så har jeg profil på Dagbok Online... ::biggrin::

"var dette alt du hadde å komme med" faktisk.. :) sterkt.. ;) vel, jeg bare lurer på hvorfor du ikke kjører noe mer selvkomponert egentlig, men om du er fornøyd er jo det såklart bare bra.. :)

Jeg mente ikke å være frekk, beklager det. ::blush::

Jeg tror faktisk at det var denne dietten JohnBlund brukte også....Og hans resultater er formidable... ::2thumbsup::

The Omnivore:

Myth 3: 'Low-carbohydrate, High-Protein Diets cause Osteoporosis.'

The accusation is that high protein intakes cause calcium to 'leech' from bones, thus causing bone-thinning. A review of the research in this area shows that high protein intake, in the presence of alkalinising fruit and vegetable intake and adequate calcium intake, either has no adverse affect on bone mass or has a positive affect on bone mass (51).

High-carb advocates are quick to point out that meat increases the acid load in the body, claiming this will lead to bone thinning. They are strangely silent when it comes to pointing out that grains also increase the acid load in the body (57). Those attacking low-carb diets like to portray them as `unbalanced' diets, consisting of huge amounts of animal protein and little else.

Don't believe them! Alkalinising low-carbohydrate vegetables and small servings of low-glycemic fruits are a perfect compliment to animal protein in a low-carb diet. Dr. Robert Atkins, invariably mentioned by those attacking low-carb diets, repeatedly recommended the consumption of fruits and (especially) vegetables in his writings. Paleolithic nutrition (my favoured approach to low-carb eating) is by its very nature a diet high not only in animal protein but low-carbohydrate plant foods.

Studies have shown high levels of protein and calcium to act synergistically in increasing bone mineral density (BMD). Higher protein intake was significantly associated with a favorable change in total-body BMD in elderly subjects supplemented with calcium and vitamin D. In this 3 year study, a placebo group not receiving the supplements did not experience such favourable changes (52).

The message here is to consume a well-rounded diet that includes whole-food sources of protein, and alkalinising plant foods. A calcium and vitamin D supplement may well be warranted for those at risk of, and wishing to prevent, bone thinning.

A recent study from Denmark examined the effects of a six-month high-protein diet vs a low-protein diet in 65 overweight adults. No adverse effects on bone mineral content were seen in the high-protein group, who lost almost twice as much weight as the low-protein group (53).

A study with women 55-69 years of age showed that as the consumption of animal protein increased, the incidence of hip fracture decreased (54).

Another study showed significantly lower calcium absorption in women consuming the lowest-fat, highest-fiber diets, compared to those eating the highest-fat, lowest-fiber diets (55).
For over 2 million years, humans were hunter-gatherers. Through their research, paleontologists have determined what the hunter-gatherers ate - and it wasn't pasta, rice cakes and low-fat cookies! (56) The hunter-gatherers ate a diet rich in animal protein. Far from being delicate and fracture-prone, their remains show skeletal structures that were more robust than those of modern man.

The hunter-gatherers consumed mainly meat, and a wide variety of wild plant foods - nuts, seeds, and alkaline fruits and vegetables. Grain consumption was either non-existent or minimal. The widespread consumption of grains in the human diet is a relatively recent phenomenon, dating back 10,000 years. Grains and legumes contain 'anti-nutrients' such as phytates, which act to intefere with the body's absorption of vital minerals, particularly iron and zinc (which is essential for healthy bone formation) (58,59). As mentioned, grains also increase the acid load in the body.

We can see that a low-carbohydrate, high fat, high protein diet is a far better choice for building strong bones than a low-fat, high-carbohydrate diet. It ensures adequate intake of protein; it replaces acid-forming, phytate-containing grains and legumes with alkalinising fruits and vegetables; and the fat content of such a diet assists the absorption of fat-soluble bone-building vitamins like Vitamin D and K.

Kommentar til nevnte studie av The Omnivore:

While popular weight loss diets vary widely in their nutritional prescriptions, their promoters do share one common trait--a staunch insistence that their regimen is the ultimate path to a wonderfully slim, trim and super-attractive figure.

Boston researchers decided to put four of the best-known popular diets--Atkins, Zone, Weight Watchers, and Ornish--to the test. The researchers not only examined the ability of these diets to produce weight loss, but also their impact upon cardiovascular risk factors.(1)

The participants in the study were overweight or obese adults aged 22 to 72 years with known hypertension, 'dyslipidemia', or fasting hyperglycemia. A total of 160 participants were initially randomized to either Atkins (carbohydrate restriction), Zone (macronutrient balance), Weight Watchers (calorie restriction), or Ornish (fat restriction) diet groups.

The Atkins diet group aimed for less than 20 g of carbohydrate daily, with a gradual increase toward 50 g daily. The Zone group aimed for a 40-30-30 balance of percentage calories from carbohydrate, fat, and protein, respectively. The Weight Watchers group aimed to keep total daily "points" in a range determined by current weight. Each "point" was roughly 50 calories, and most participants aimed for 24 to 32 points daily. Lists provided by the Weight Watchers Corporation determined point values of common foods. The Ornish group aimed for a vegetarian diet containing 10% of calories from fat.

The trial ran for one year. Like most long-term dietary studies, the attrition rate was high. Drop out rates were 35% on the Zone diet, 35% on Weight Watchers, 47% on Atkins, and 50% on the Ornish regimen.

At one year, the mean weight loss was 2.1 kg for Atkins, 3.2 kg for Zone, 3.0 kg for Weight Watchers, and 3.3 kg for Ornish. There were no statistically significant differences in weight loss between the four groups. The researchers found that the amount of weight loss was associated with the level of self-reported dietary adherence, but not with diet type.

For each diet, decreasing levels of total/HDL cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and insulin were significantly associated with weight loss, again with no significant difference between diets. There were no significant effects on blood pressure or glucose at one year.

What's wrong with this picture?

As in most other dietary intervention studies, the subjects were given detailed counseling at the start of the trial on the diet they were to follow. According to the researchers, "To approximate the realistic long-term sustainability of each diet, we asked participants to follow their dietary assignment to the best of their ability until their 2-month assessment…".

So far so good.

After the 2-month point however, "we encouraged them to follow their assigned diet according to their own self-determined interest level." Instead of being told to continue adhering to the diet as closely as possible, the subjects were told to follow their assigned diet "to whatever extent they wanted".(2)
 
Diet gurus on trial?

Dr. Atkins


Dr. Barry Sears


Weight Watchers founder, Jean Nidetch


Dean Ornish 


Crikey! If, as a fitness trainer, I told individuals to work out diligently for 2 months, but to then follow their prescribed program "according to their own self-determined interest level", I know all too well where I would subsequently find most of my clients--and it wouldn't be in the gym! Most would forget about training and head straight for the couch, where their 'self-determined interest level' would have them performing interval training of another type ('Pepsi curls' interspersed with remote control button-pressing).

Adopting a new diet or exercise regimen requires focus and discipline, at least long enough for the new regimen to become second nature. The very fact that the individuals in this study were overweight and in poor physical condition shows that, prior to the study, they were:

1) unaware of the correct measures required to maintain healthy weight, and/or;

2) incapable of maintaining the necessary habits required to maintain a healthy weight.

Either way, the subjects in this study were given poor advice. Humans are inherently lazy; if we don't have to exert ourselves then more often than not we won't. Telling overweight individuals to follow a diet only to the extent that they feel like doing so virtually guarantees a high rate of failure and non-compliance! It's little wonder that there was such a high attrition rate in this study, and that the subjects experienced such paltry weight loss after 12 months (any trainer I hired who could only average a piddling 2-3 kg weight loss in his clients after 12 months would be fired real quick!).

The Atkins diet that wasn't

For readers' benefit, I have presented the dietary data from the Boston study's Atkins group in table 1 (below). It can be clearly seen that at no time between months 1 and 12 did the group actually adhere to the prescribed fifty gram carbohydrate limit. In fact, it appears that the Atkins group followed a low-carbohydrate diet only during the first month, when the mean carbohydrate intake was 68 grams. By months six and twelve, carbohydrate intake was 190 grams (carb intake among the Atkins dieters at 12 months ranged from 127-239g). This might be a minimal carbohydrate intake for a professional road cyclist, but for the average Joe, a daily carbohydrate intake of 190 grams can hardly be considered low!


 Table 1. Dietary intake for 'Atkins' dieters in Dansinger et al 2005.
Month 1 2 6 12
Total calorie intake 1705 1736 1846 1886
 Carb intake (g) 68 137 190 190
 Fat intake, (g) 95.5 89.5 80.5 80.5
 Protein intake (g) 109 93.5 82 86
 Protein/Fat/Carbohydrate (%)  26/50/16 21/47/32 18/39/42 18/38/40


While carbohydrate consumption rose throughout the study, protein and fat intakes declined to relatively low levels. To further place the figures in Table 1 into proper perspective, the carbohydrate, fat, and protein intakes for the Ornish dieters at 12 months were 218g, 64g, and 76.5g, respectively.

Speaking of Ornish, the outspoken vegetarian proponent claimed in a Medscape article that the results of the Boston study were proof of the superiority of his diet. Only problem is, like the Atkins dieters, the Ornish group were not following anything even close to their assigned diet. At 1 year, those following the 'Ornish' regimen, designed to limit fat intake to only ten percent of total calories, were in fact consuming 32% of their calories as fat, 48% as carbohydrates, and 17% as protein--a macronutrient breakdown similar to that of the average American diet!

It is interesting to note that the lowest dropout rates and the tightest compliance to the prescribed dietary ratios were seen amongst the Zone and Weight Watchers dieters. Both of these recommend dietary protein/fat/carbohydrate ratios far closer to those currently consumed by the average American. Diets like Atkins and Ornish feature macronutrient ratios that deviate from the average diet to a far greater extent; in order to be a given a fair and objective trial, and to avoid a 'regression to the mean'-type effect in dieters whose motivation is waning, researchers need to take every possible step to ensure such diets are consumed in the prescribed manner. This simply did not happen in the Boston study.

If you want to enjoy the benefits of a low-carb diet, then follow…a low-carb diet!

There are now three trials that have examined Atkins-style diets and have shown no significant difference in weight loss after twelve months(1,7,8). In all of these, the low-carb dieters started out eating true low-carb diets, but steadily reverted back to higher carbohydrate, lower protein diets as the trial progressed.

This is yet another reason why I prefer low-carb plans that prescribe a constant level of carbohydrate intake that falls under the 100 grams per day limit. A great example is Life Without Bread, which prescribes 72 grams of carbs per day--no induction phases, no maintenance phases, just healthy low-carb eating on a consistent long-term basis.

In stark contrast, many people who try multi-phasic plans like Atkins evidently believe that they can travel from one extreme to another--from the extremely low-carb ketogenic 'induction phase' to a maintenance phase that borders on a high-carbohydrate intake. If their goal is sustained weight loss, they are sadly misguided.

What this study really shows

The correct conclusion to be drawn from this and previous studies is that a low-carb regimen like Atkins will not produce greater weight loss than higher carb diets if you follow a half-baked, mutated high-carbohydrate version of the diet.

Atkins-dietten er utvilsom meget effektiv med tanke på vektreduksjon/reduksjon av fettprosent. Det samme gjelder for øvrig alle andre "dietter" som innebærer et lavere kaloriinntak enn forbruk over tid som man klarer å følge. ;) Når man har kommet til det punkt at man innser at reduksjon av fettprosent ikke er mer hokus-pokus enn dette (innta færre kalorier enn du forbruker over tid), kan man benytte seg av alle mulige dietter for vektreduksjon med godt resultat.

Hvis man ser på det nye kostholdet som en permanent endring i kostholdet/en varig livsstilsendring, og ikke bare en (midlertidig) diett, ja så vil man beholde det gode resultatet også. Derfor er det viktig å finne et kosthold man trives med, for ellers klarer man ikke å følge det opp over tid! Jeg personlig ville aldri vært komfortabel med et Atkins-kosthold, men har likevel null problemer med å manipulere kroppssammensetningen min fordi jeg har kontroll på min egen kaloribalanse. ;) Det samme gjelder f. eks. alle fitness- og kroppsbyggerutøvere på deff.

At mange lykkes med og trives på et Atkins-kosthold er jo hevet over enhver tvil, og er helt flott!

Sammen med et timet inntak av høy-GI-karbs rett før og rett etter trening, vil et slikt kosthold også kunne gi meget bra resultater i et muskelbyggingsperspektiv. Kutter man imidlertid karbohydratene helt også i tiden rett rundt trening, vil man ikke få optimale resultater av treningen, men man kan få brukbare resultater.

H

Vet ikke om dette var direkte rettet mot meg (noe jeg ikke tror det var), men jeg vet i allefall at ja, det går på kalorier... uansett hvilken diett jeg følger vil vekttapet være det samme ved likt kcal inntak. :spise:

Men.... med meg er det selvkontroll over tid som er problemet... Atkins er så streng at jeg klarer å følge den over tid uten å skli ut, for gjør jeg det vet jeg på en måte at løpet er kjørt...

Jeg er en person som trenger klare retningslinjer for å gå ned i vekt.........dessuten når man er på denne dietten får man helt klart økt viljestyrke på alle andre områder også....  :weightlifter3:   vet ikke hvorfor....  :what:

...sikkert for det du er så søt  :-*

Stå på. Er beinhardt uten karbs, men man kan jo ikke leve hele livet uten karb. Zone dietten er bedre i lengden, og her er det jo bøker å få kjøpt.(på nett) + at de har eget nettsted selvfølgelig. Det jeg ikke liker med atkins er fettet. Hva i all verden skal man med alt det usunne fettet?
Liker den avataren by the way. Kul.

Honnør  HITman .. virker som om mange som ikke har vært inni "gamet" tror man må til med en "Fancy" slankekur ,mirakelpulvre og piller for og gå ned i vekt. Men nøkkelen er jo kalori underskudd enten du velger å kutte ned mye på matveien eller øke kardi. Men utover dette er det jo forskjellige meninger om oppsett i forhold til karbs proteiner og fett

jeg spiser ikke noe særlig med fett utenom det jeg steker kjøttet mitt i, og det som er i en klatt med seterrømme el.lign. Også tar jeg 2-3 omega3 kapsler i døgnet.... Vet ikke om jeg burde tatt mer men det funker nå bra sånn som det er nå.....

Takk pus..... ;)

Jeg vil bare tilføye at vektnedgang (ved Atkins diett) kun fungerer skikkelig ved nok inntak av kalorier og fett. Litt av poenget med dietten er at man faktisk går ned i vekt (hhv. fett, vann, muskler) selv ved ikke-redusert kaloriinntak.
MEN det skal være nevnt at det er ikke lett å spise nok på denne dietten, da man "glemmer" å spise grunnet liten eller ingen sultfølelse.

Jeg bruker dietten kun i en deffeperiode. Er jeg på bulk spiser jeg "normalt", prøver å fokusere på å få nok proteiner pr dag og karbohydatene på rett tid.

Jeg vil nå bare tilføye at det er mange veier til fettreduksjon akkurat slik ordtaket er; det er mange veier til rom

Uansett hvilken vei du velger så kommer du frem..
Mennersker er alle forskjellige, Vi har forskjellige kroppstyper og forskjellig personlighet

At alle dietter / kostholdsendringer / treningsprogrammer med dertil egnet kosthold virker er det ikke tvil om..

Det er ikke uten grunn du hører om folk som bruker atkins og har gådt ned 50kg og om folk som bruker grete roede og har gådd ned 40kg samt de som følger fedon å har gådd ned 45kg ja til og med de som bruker dc sitt kosthold å har gådd ned i vekt osv...

Ettersom vi er så forskjellige som vi er trenger noen beinharde retnigslinjer å forholde seg til for å lykkes i starten med fettreduseringen, mens andre trenger ikke fullt så drastiske tiltak for å lykkes..

De som er "svak" for snop og godt vil med å kun reduser kcal ikke kunne klare å kontrollere inntaket som de burde selv, siden fristelsene fort blir for store og de spiser mer enn de burde..

Om de da velger dietter ala atkins så vet de hva de har å forholde seg til å dermed er sannsynligheten får å lykkes større..
I tilleg går de hurtig ned i vekt til å begynne med noe som igjen gjør at de blir mer motivert og risikoen for å skli ut er mindre..

Dette gjelder noen mennesker, andre igjen kan rett og slett bare redusere matinntaket å holde det i kontroll, men for å klare dette kreves det selv disiplin og det er det slettes ikke alle som har og i å mjed at vektreduseringen per uke i starten er mindre enn ved atkins lav karb er det lett å gi opp om motivasjonen/selvdidiplinen ikke er der...

Men til syvende å sist for å holde den reduksjonen du har nådd er det kostholdsendring som må til. så når du har nådd ditt mål med vekt reduseringen bør enn begynne å tenke på hvordan vedlikeholde dette og ikke skli ut i gamle vaner...

:)

Skal bare tilføye at DC sitt kostoppleg er ganske genialt på området ettersom Dante aka DC annbefaler samme kosthold ved å øke i kroppsvekt som han annbefaler om du vil redusere kroppsvekt, eneste forskjell er at ved reduskjon så legger du til kardio for å gå ned i vekt.

:)

Hva bygger du den påstanden på ? :)

Dante selv...!

:)

Dante aka dogcrapp aka eier av intensmuscle forum

Jo, det vet jeg vel. Men hvorfor mener du at han holder kostholdet likt hele veien. Det du implisitt sier da er at han ikke anbefaler kardio under ikke-deff perioden ??

Igjen må jeg pressisere at det er rettningslinjer du kommer med, og det er ikke slik jeg kjører kostholdet fra DC. :)

Selfølgelig tilpasser dogcrap den enkeltes behov / ønsker men i bunn å grunn er det utganspunktet han følger med modifikasjoner for den enkeltes spesifike ønsker...

:)

Han tilpasser i forhold tli hva den enkelte MÅ gjøre, ikke hva den enkelte ønsker. Det er hvordan kroppen reagerer som bestemmer dette.

Men det er faktisk viktig å skille de linjene fra kostholdet man finner fra det som tilpasses. For likhetene er ikke nødvendigvis så mange.....

Men igjen, dette blir en diskusjon rundt DC-kostholdet igjen, vi får heller ta det i en egen tråd  - så langt det er mulig. Uansett så mener jeg at det ikke er mulig å kun legge til kardio for å gå ned i vekt.... fra å ligge i godt pluss til  å gå i god minus kcalorimessig - det blir i så fall MYE kardio. Og Dante er ingen stor fan av kardio egentlig....

Ops beklager min feil, burde selfølgelig skrevet..

eneste forskjell er at ved reduskjon så legger du til "mer" kardio for å gå ned i vekt.

Vet at DC anbefaler "enkelte" kardio ved vektøkning pga enkelte fordeler som følger med kardiotrening, slik som bla økt appetitt...


:)

Kunne ikke sagt det bedre selv....

Men jeg får faktisk bedre selv disiplin på denne dietten på alle andre områder også... feks trener nå 5 dager i uken og har sluttet å røyke.....

Men jeg får faktisk bedre selv disiplin på denne dietten på alle andre områder også... feks trener nå 5 dager i uken og har sluttet å røyke.....

Veldig bra - gratulerer! :)

De viktigste tingene man selv kan gjøre for å sikre seg best mulige odds for livslang god helse er:

1) Holde en slank midje (uansett kosthold!)
2) Trene regelmessig og være generelt aktiv
3) Ikke røyke, og holde alkoholforbruket lavt-moderat
4) og ikke minst: TRIVES!

Du ser ut til å lykkes med alle fire!  ::2thumbsup::

H

Ja, her har blitt sagt mye fornuftig om emnet. Jeg er helt enig at den enkelte må finne sin egen måte å gjøre ting på.
Jeg har selv en del kroppsfett som jeg må bli kvitt og har derfor nå i 10 dager fulgt en 0-karbodiett. Jeg følger ikke Atkins eller Fedon, men heller min egen. Jeg spiser mye hele egg og bacon, kjøtt (med fettet), smør, mandler, hvitløk...stort sett. Jeg inntar imidlertid et karbohydratmåltid to ganger i uken for å fylle opp lagrene av glykogen i leveren og musklene.
Det er selvfølgelig tidlig å trekke de helt store slutningene, men noen erfaringer kan jeg dele:
-er avvent fra sukker og søtsaker. Selv med lavt blodsukker har jeg ingen "craving".
-tenker klarere.
-noen dager ute i dietten opplevde jeg noe "nervøsitet" og problemer med å sovne og tidlig oppvåkning. Jeg har siden funnet ut at det kommer av utsondring av stresshormoner som adrenalin, glucagon og kortison som øker blodsukkeret. Dette gikk imidlertid fort over. Det virker som om kroppen trenger litt tid på å omstille seg til "høyoktan".
-metthetsfølelse. Fettrike måltid holder blodsukkeret oppe i 6 timer mens karbohydrater gjør det i 1 1/2 time, jf. Vince Gironda.
Jeg passe på å spise hver tredje time.

Hvis det fortsetter på denne måten fremover, har jeg funnet min måte å spise sunt på.
Kan legge til at jeg satser på så naturlige råvarer som mulig, men det er ikke enkelt nå til dags da man får "plast og syntetisk mat" tilbudt overalt. Bare spør Lillebjørn....:-)

Høres ut som du trives med dette...
Går vel egentlig ikke Atkins til punkt og prikke selv heller, skal jo ifølge dietten øke karb inntaket etter 14 dager, men det gjør ikke jeg...følger introen hele veien.

Hvor mye har du mistet da??

Trener du itillegg, event. hva??

Ser du skriver at du spiser endel mandler og hvitløk....hvor mye da?

Spiser du fisk?

Det ble litt mange spørsmål her, men jeg er en veldig nyskjerrig person... ::blush::

Legger inn en liten notis om L-Glutamin og Atkins...


L - Glutamine - Useful For Dieters?

L- glutamine is an important amino acid you may be interested in learning about. Amino acids are the "building blocks" of protein, and they are classified as "essential" (meaning the body cannot synthesize them itself and must obtain them from the diet), or "non-essential" (meaning the body can make them from various raw materials). L - glutamine is considered "conditionally non-essential" meaning normally the body can make enough to meet its own needs. However, in times of stress or trauma the body can run low on l-glutamine, and needs to obtain extra from an outside source.

So far, so boring right?

Hang in there, I'm getting to the good stuff.

Normally glutamine is marketed to body builders because it has been shown to enhance muscle recovery and strength, display anticatabolic behavior, increase protein synthesis, and muscle hydration -- all important stuff, you'll agree.

Those familiar with Dr Atkins' diet will have heard of glutamine -- Dr Atkins recommends supplementing with it during his diet's initial period of extreme carbohydrate restriction. L - glutamine helps protect the lean muscle mass that is so threatened at this stage. It can also be metabolized into glucose for fuel if necessary. All in all, a good idea, and a great supplement for this purpose.

However, l - glutamine has been touted as a miracle weight loss supplement by a few "less than scrupulous" marketers. A recent release by The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition has shown that oral supplementation with as little as 2 grams (about half a teaspoon) of glutamine significantly elevated circulating growth hormone levels! Because HGH (human growth hormone) has powerful anabolic (muscle building) and fat burning powers, various supplement makers have tossed a few grains of l-glutamine into their compilations so as to "validate" their outrageous claims.

The biggest contributors to this problem are the makers of the "lose weight while you sleep" products. Some add a tiny bit of glutamine into a product's formulation, and claim the powerful fat burning powers of HGH will burn the weight off you while you sleep.

Here's the first problem... in order to get the benefits of this amino, you need to supplement in significant amounts -- with anywhere between 2-5 grams per serving. The reason is this -- one of the largest consumers of l-glutamine in the body is the small intestine -- and you must take in significant amounts in order to get any past this glutton and into your bloodstream. Most of the "miracle products" contain only trace amounts of l-glutamine; not enough for you to obtain ANY benefit. In addition, glutamine is relatively unstable in solution form.

Second problem... Yes, growth hormone has both anabolic and fat burning powers, but it has yet to be demonstrated that relatively brief periods of increased serum growth hormone has any *significant* effect on weight loss. Again, it's a case of putting the cart before the horse for the sake of a few dollars. It's a shame, because glutamine is a very worthwhile supplement.

Proper Supplementation:

L-glutamine is a tasteless, odorless white powder. It can be mixed with water, juice, or diet pop, as long as it is consumed immediately (I recommend mixing with juice, otherwise it tastes like "chalk-water"). I recommend 5 grams (1 teaspoon) twice daily -- on an empty stomach before bed and immediately upon rising. Bodybuilders and those on the severe carbohydrate restriction period of the Atkins diet may wish to double this, and add two more divided doses. At 10 grams a day, 300 grams will do you for the month, at a cost of about $28. Here's some glutamine sources from my favorite online retailer...

AST GL3 Glutamine, 300 grams

AST GL3 Glutamine, 600 grams

EAS Glutamine 1000mg

Final recommendation? A great supplement for body builders, anyone on the Atkins low carb diet, and anyone who wants the possible benefits of elevated serum growth hormone levels. I take this stuff daily. Just don't expect the weight to melt off you while you sleep. :-)

     

Takk!

Det var veldig nyttig lesestoff... ::biggrin::

Samboeren min, bad-2-da-b1, går på samme dietten og han tar 5g L- glutamin utenom det som er i 90+ Protein pulveret (17%), hver dag...

Tror jeg skal prøve dette jeg også, for han har faktisk hatt et litt bedre foreløpig resultat enn meg.........

Honnør til deg! :gull:

Helt greit det pus.
Jeg har gått ned 2-2 1/2 kilo, men kroppsvekten betyr lite for meg. Jeg har hatt en lang inaktiv periode og startet trening samtidig, slik at jeg forventer reduksjon av fett og økning av muskelmasse (håper i alle fall).

Jeg trener kun med vekter. Har jobbet meg gradvis opp og har nesten kommet til vedlikeholdstreningen med 6x6 og 30 sekunder pause mellom settene. Når kondisen blir enda bedre (den har blitt betraktelig bedre allerede) skal jeg redusere enda mere på pausene. Dette er skikkelig hard trening! Ser lett ut på papiret, men i praksis....

Jeg er ikke glad i fisk men tar 15-30 ml. tran daglig. Mandler har jeg nettopp begynt med siden de inneholder minst karbo av nøttene. 25-30 gram av dem sammen med et måltid er fint for meg. Jeg tar tre båter med hvitløk daglig, rå sammen med kjøtt eller egg/bacon.

Supplementerer med en multi, vit. C, kalsium, sink og nå nylig, tangmel. Skal kjøpe noen tilskudd til for å få til en god kombinasjon men, det selges jo knapt vitamin og mineraltilskudd i Norge.

Er du med på sidene til Atkins? Håper du trives og at dietten går bra.

Har du gått ned i fettprosent da?

Når det gjelder karbs i nøtter/mandler:

cashewnøtter 19,7%
hasselnøtter 6,0%
mandler 8,7%
paranøtter 3,1%
valnøtter 6,2%
pecannøtter 5,8%

Selv spiser jeg litt pecannøtter....avogtil...som snacks.

Hvitløk har et innhold på 24,2%.

Jeg fører dagbok her på forumet, der står det meste om hva jeg spiser, hva jeg trener, hvilke tilskudd jeg tar, og kroppsmålene mine...
Ellers så går jeg av og til inn på lavkarbo.no når jeg lurer på noe ang Atkins...

Ble fortalt idag viktigheten av å ta L-glutamine på slike dietter som denne, tror faktisk det var i denne tråden....

Stå på!!! ::biggrin::

Hei igjen,

Jeg synes å se en liten nedgang i fett rent visuelt, men jeg har ingen måte å måle det på. Jeg må bare være tålmodig og se fremgangen an via speilet :-)

I følge Matvaretabellen er det følgende innhold av karbohydrater -kostfiber:

Cashewnøtter: 26,5%
Hasselnøtter: 9,3%
Mandler: 6,6%
Paranøtter: 3,1%
Peanøtter: 12,5%
Valnøtter: 13,1%
Pekannøtter: 9,2%

Disse nøttene ligger med et fettinnhold fra 46,1% (Peanøtter) til 68,0% (Pekannøtter).

Så hvis man spiser 50 gram mandler,blir det ikke mere enn 3-4 gram karbo.
Disse nøttene er rike kaliumkilder, fra 400 mg. til over 1000mg. pr. 100 gram.
Mandler er den desidert største kilden til kalsium med 265 mg.

hmmm...... det var veldig rart.....
jeg har kjøpt en av atkins bøkene (karboteller)....i den står det det som jeg skrev...det samme gjør det på både valnøtt og pecannøtt boksen min...

dette må jeg finne ut av..... ???

Ja, da er det sikkert Matvaretabellen som er feil siden den ble gitt ut av Statens Ernæringsråd. Når de kommer med vranglære angående kosthold, hvorfor skulle ikke det samme være tilfelle her? Tabellen jeg har er forøvrig fra 1995.

Men, i tilfellet nøtter er det i alle fall for meg ikke av noen betydning om det er 6 eller 12% karbohydrater. Spiser jeg 25 gram nøtter med 12%, blir det jo bare 3 gram karbo og det betyr ingenting i den store sammenhengen.

Disse differansene har også noe å gjøre med at i USA teller man ikke kostfiber som karbohydrater, da det ikke er fordøyelig og ikke påvirker blodsukkeret. I Norge kan man legge til kostfiber under karbohydrater, dersom kostfiber ikke er nevnt spesifikt.

Det er mange måter å telle karbohydrater på. F.eks sukkeralkoholer er nevnt under karbohydrater, MEN teller ikke som karbo på en Atkins kur, da de ikke påvirker ketosen eller blodsukkeret. Altså NET karbs=0gram.
Se f.eks på en pakke med sukkerfrie pastiller som Cool Active. Over 90% karbo, hvor av sukkeralkoholer=alt. Altså 0 gram NET karbs.

Problemet er hvis man følger en kanonstreng diett (som Atkins induksjonfase), så kan man ikke spise noe med et innhold større enn 20% karbo, da denne konsentrasjonen kan påvirke ketose og blodsukker. MEN man kan spise opp til 20g karbo pr dag. Uansett er ikke det mye, og man vil gjerne få i seg de få karboene gjennom annen mat. Fett får man nok av igjennom kjøttet og tilskudd som ikke inneholder karbs.

Var det meningen å høres så negativ ut, eller....?
Jeg synes bare at det var RART at forskjellen var så stor....

Til prinsessepus og bad-2-da-b1

Atkins carb counter

Carb Gram Counter
Portion Food item Total Carbs (g) Fiber (g) Net Carbs (g) Fat (g) Protein (g) Calories
CHEESES
1.00 piece American Cheese, 2/3 oz. slice 0.3 0 0.3 6.6 4.7 79
2.00 tbs Blue Cheese, crumbled 0.4 0 0.4 4.8 3.6 60
2.00 tbs Cheddar Cheese-Shredded 0.2 0 0.2 4.7 3.5 57
2.00 tbs Cream Cheese 0.8 0 0.8 10.1 2.2 101
0.50 cup Creamed Cottage Cheese-Small Curd 2.8 0 2.8 4.7 13.1 109
2.00 tbs Feta Cheese, crumbled 0.8 0 0.8 4.0 2.7 49
2.00 tbs Fontina Cheese-Shredded 0.2 0 0.2 4.2 3.5 53
2.00 tbs Goat Cheese-Soft Type 0.3 0 0.3 6.5 5.7 82
1.00 oz-wt Mascarpone Cheese 0.6 0 0.6 13.2 2.0 126
2.00 tbs Monterey Jack Cheese-Shredded0.1 0 0.1 4.3 3.5 53
2.00 tbs Mozzarella Cheese-Whole Milk-Shredded 0.3 0 0.3 3.1 2.7 40
2.00 tbs Muenster Cheese-Shredded 0.2 0 0.2 4.2 3.3 52
2.00 tbs Parmesan Cheese-Shredded 0.3 0 0.3 2.7 3.8 42
1.00 oz-wt Provolone Cheese-Diced 0.6 0 0.6 7.5 7.3 100
0.25 cup Ricotta Cheese-Whole Milk 1.9 0 1.9 8.0 6.9 107
2.00 tbs Swiss Cheese-Shredded 0.5 0 0.5 3.7 3.8 51

MILK, CREAM & BUTTER
1.00 tsp Butter 0.0 0 0.0 3.8 0.0 34
1.00 cup Buttermilk, 1% lowfat 13.0 0 13.0 2.5 9.0 110
2.00 tbs Half and Half Cream 1.0 0 1.0 3.0 1.0 40
2.00 tbs Heavy Whipping Cream 0.8 0 0.8 11.0 0.6 103
1.00 cup Milk, 2% 11.7 0 11.7 4.7 8.1 121
1.00 cup Milk, Whole 11.4 0 11.4 8.1 8.0 150
2.00 tbs Sour Cream 1.2 0 1.2 6.0 0.9 62
1.00 tsp Whipped Butter 0.0 0 0.0 2.6 0.0 23
1.00 cup Yogurt, lowfat, plain 17.2 0 17.2 3.8 12.9 155
1.00 cup Yogurt, whole milk, plain 11.4 0 11.4 8.0 8.5 150

BEEF & VEAL
6.00 oz-wt Beef Brisket 0.0 0 0.0 43.2 41.8 569
6.00 oz-wt Beef Chuck 0.0 0 0.0 31.6 50.1 498
6.00 oz-wt Beef Eye Round 0.0 0 0.0 24.0 45.2 410
1.00 oz-wt Beef Jerky 3.1 0.5 2.6 7.3 9.4 116
6.00 oz-wt Beef Short Ribs 0.0 0 0.0 71.4 36.7 801
6.00 oz-wt Beef Tenderloin 0.0 0 0.0 41.8 40.7 551
6.00 oz-wt Beef, Ground, Chuck 0.0 0 0.0 44.0 38.9 562
6.00 oz-wt Beef, Ground, Round 0.0 0 0.0 28.1 46.7 454
6.00 oz-wt Calf Liver 10.4 0 10.4 9.9 40.5 304
6.00 oz-wt Chuck Eye Steak 0.0 0 0.0 41.1 46.2 568
6.00 oz-wt Corned Beef Brisket 0.3 0 0.3 33.8 33.3 449
6.00 oz-wt Cubed steak 0.0 0 0.0 8.3 53.9 306
2.00 oz-wt Frankfurter, Beef 1.1 0 1.1 16.6 7.2 185
6.00 oz-wt Ground Veal 0.0 0 0.0 12.9 41.5 293
6.00 oz-wt Meas Raw Boneless: BeefSteak-Shell-All-Lean-1/4"Trim-Brld 1.0 0 0.0 11.8 36.0 261
6.00 oz-wt Prime Rib 0.0 0 0.0 56.4 36.9 667
6.00 oz-wt Rib Eye Roast 0.0 0 0.0 37.8 42.4 522
6.00 oz-wt Rib Eye Steak 0.0 0 0.0 19.9 47.7 383
6.00 oz-wt Roast Beef, Deli 2.3 0 2.3 5.2 34.3 193
6.00 oz-wt Shell Steak 0.0 0 0.0 21.3 64.9 469
6.00 oz-wt Sirloin Steak 0.0 0 0.0 13.6 51.7 344
6.00 oz-wt Skirt Steak 0.0 0 0.0 54.7 61.6 758
6.00 oz-wt Top Loin 0.0 0 0.0 12.1 51.0 327
6.00 oz-wt Top Sirloin 0.0 0 0.0 30.4 44.2 463
6.00 oz-wt Veal Arm Shoulder 0.0 0 0.0 13.1 40.4 291
6.00 oz-wt Veal Breast 0.0 0 0.0 33.5 39.6 472
6.00 oz-wt Veal Cutlet 0.0 0 0.0 30.4 53.4 502
6.00 oz-wt Veal Loin 0.0 0 0.0 30.4 53.4 502
6.00 oz-wt Veal Rib Chop 0.0 0 0.0 22.2 38.0 362
6.00 oz-wt Veal Round Steak 0.0 0 0.0 7.0 47.6 265
6.00 oz-wt Veal Scallops 0.0 0 0.0 6.3 52.2 279
6.00 oz-wt Veal Shank 0.0 0 0.0 7.9 43.4 256
6.00 oz-wt Veal Stew Meat 0.0 0 0.0 13.4 40.2 292

LAMB
6.00 oz-wt Ground Lamb 0.0 0 0.0 30.3 38.2 436
6.00 oz-wt Lamb Rib Chops 0.0 0 0.0 50.3 37.6 614
6.00 oz-wt Lamb Shoulder 0.0 0 0.0 12.6 46.2 312
6.00 oz-wt Lamb Stew Meat 0.0 0 0.0 15.0 57.3 379
6.00 oz-wt Leg of Lamb, bone in 0.0 0 0.0 8.2 30.0 203
6.00 oz-wt Rack of Lamb, bone in 0.0 0 0.0 9.9 19.5 173

POULTRY
6.00 oz-wt Chicken Breast Cutlet 0.0 0 0.0 12.7 48.7 322
6.00 oz-wt Chicken Breast, boneless 0.0 0 0.0 12.7 48.7 322
1.00 each Chicken leg 0.0 0 0.0 15.4 29.7 265
1.00 each Chicken Thigh 0.0 0 0.0 9.6 15.5 153
6.00 oz-wt Chicken Thigh, boneless 0.0 0 0.0 34.6 39.2 479
6.00 oz-wt Chicken Thigh, skinless, boneless 0.0 0 0.0 8.9 44.6 270
1.00 each Chicken Wing 0.0 0 0.0 6.6 9.1 99
6.00 oz-wt Chicken, ground 0.0 0 0.0 22.5 40.2 374
6.00 oz-wt Chicken, light and dark, roasted, chopped 0.0 0 0.0 12.6 49.2 323
6.00 oz-wt Chicken, whole 0.1 0 0.1 14.7 29.8 260
2.00 oz-wt Chicken/turkey sausage 0.3 0 0.3 6.4 9.6 97
6.00 oz-wt Cornish Game Hen 0.0 0 0.0 26.1 31.9 372
6.00 oz-wt Duck breast, skinless 0.0 0 0.0 9.6 45.0 279
6.00 oz-wt Duck, whole 0.0 0 0.0 89.2 26.1 916
6.00 oz-wt Goose, whole 0.0 0 0.0 23.6 27.1 329
6.00 oz-wt Turkey breast cutlet 0.0 0 0.0 1.5 59.3 266
6.00 oz-wt Turkey Breast, skinless, boneless 0.0 0 0.0 1.5 59.3 266
6.00 oz-wt Turkey, ground 0.0 0 0.0 21.2 44.1 378
6.00 oz-wt Turkey, whole 0.1 0 0.1 12.2 36.1 264

PORK
3.00 piece Bacon 0.1 0 0.1 9.4 5.8 109
3.00 piece Canadian Bacon 0.9 0 0.9 5.9 16.9 129
6.00 oz-wt Ground Pork 0.0 0 0.0 33.4 41.4 478
6.00 oz-wt Ham, boneless 0.0 0 0.0 15.3 38.5 303
2.00 oz-wt Kielbasa 0.8 0 0.8 17.2 7.6 191
1.00 oz-wt Pancetta 0.2 0 0.2 14.0 8.6 163
6.00 oz-wt Pork Chop, center cut 0.0 0 0.0 9.7 34.9 237
2.00 oz-wt Pork frankfurter 1.4 0 1.4 16.5 6.4 181
6.00 oz-wt Pork Loin Chops 0.0 0 0.0 32.4 27.9 412
6.00 oz-wt Pork Loin Roas 0.0 0 0.0 19.7 36.4 333
6.00 oz-wt Pork loin, boneless 0.0 0 0.0 24.9 46.1 422
2.00 each Pork Sausage 2.0 0 2.0 34.4 26.8 433
6.00 oz-wt Pork Spareribs 0.0 0 0.0 51.5 49.4 675
6.00 oz-wt Pork Tenderloin 0.0 0 0.0 8.2 47.9 279
6.00 oz-wt Prosciutto 0.9 0 0.9 13.0 37.4 281

LUNCH MEATS
3.00 oz-wt Beef Bologna 0.7 0 0.7 24.2 10.4 265
3.00 oz-wt Beef Salami 2.4 0 2.4 17.6 12.8 223
3.00 oz-wt BeefPastrami 2.6 0 2.6 24.8 14.7 297
3.00 oz-wt Deli ham 1.5 0 1.5 2.3 13.7 91
3.00 oz-wt Pork Bologna 0.6 0 0.6 16.9 13.0 210
3.00 oz-wt Pork Salami 1.4 0 1.4 28.7 19.2 346
3.00 oz-wt Turkey Bologna 0.8 0 0.8 12.9 11.7 169
3.00 oz-wt Turkey Breast 0.0 0 0.0 6.0 21.3 162
3.00 oz-wt Turkey Roll 0.5 0 0.5 6.1 15.9 125

SEAFOOD
1.00 oz-wt Anchovies in Oil-Cnd-Drained 0.0 0 0.0 2.8 8.2 60
6.00 oz-wt Bluefish 0.0 0 0.0 9.3 43.7 270
6.00 oz-wt Catfish 0.0 0 0.0 17.2 35.3 306
6.00 oz-wt Clams, canned 8.7 0 8.7 3.3 43.5 252
6.00 oz-wt Cod 0.0 0 0.0 1.5 38.8 179
3.00 oz-wt Cod, salted 0.0 0 0.0 2.0 53.4 247
6.00 oz-wt Conch 26.4 0 26.4 1.4 81.1 468
6.00 oz-wt Crab meat 0.0 0 0.0 3.0 34.4 174
6.00 oz-wt Crab, canned 0.0 0 0.0 2.1 34.9 168
6.00 oz-wt Crab, steamed 0.0 0 0.0 3.0 34.4 174
6.00 oz-wt Halibut 0.0 0 0.0 5.2 47.2 249
6.00 oz-wt Lobster meat 2.2 0 2.2 1.0 34.9 167
6.00 oz-wt Lobster, whole 2.2 0 2.2 1.0 34.9 167
6.00 oz-wt Mackerel 0.0 0 0.0 30.3 40.6 446
6.00 oz-wt Mahi mahi 0.0 0 0.0 1.6 42.0 193
6.00 oz-wt Mussels 8.4 0 8.4 5.1 27.0 195
6.00 oz-wt Oysters 12.5 0 12.5 3.5 11.8 134
6.00 oz-wt Salmon steak 0.0 0 0.0 24.6 45.1 415
6.00 oz-wt Salmon, smoked 0.0 0 0.0 7.3 31.1 199
6.00 oz-wt Scallops 3.9 0 3.9 5.4 27.7 182
6.00 oz-wt Scrod 0.0 0 0.0 1.5 38.8 179
6.00 oz-wt Shrimp 0.0 0 0.0 1.8 35.6 168
6.00 oz-wt Smoked fish 0.0 0 0.0 34.3 30.0 437
6.00 oz-wt Snapper 0.0 0 0.0 3.0 46.5 227
6.00 oz-wt Squid 7.0 0 7.0 3.1 35.3 209
6.00 oz-wt Trout 0.0 0 0.0 12.2 41.3 287
6.00 oz-wt Tuna filet 0.0 0 0.0 2.2 53.0 245
6.00 oz-wt Tuna steak 0.0 0 0.0 2.2 53.0 245
6.00 oz-wt Tuna, canned, oil packed 0.0 0 0.0 14.0 49.6 337
6.00 oz-wt Tuna, canned, water packed 0.0 0 0.0 1.4 43.4 197

EGGS
1.00 each Egg White 0.3 0 0.3 0.0 3.5 17
1.00 each Egg Yolk 0.3 0 0.3 5.1 2.8 59
1.00 each Egg, whole 0.6 0 0.6 5.3 6.3 78

FATS, OILS & DRESSINGS
1.00 tsp Corn Oil 0.0 0 0.0 4.5 0.0 40
1.00 tsp Mayonnaise 0.1 0 0.1 3.7 0.1 33
1.00 tsp Olive Oil 0.0 0 0.0 4.5 0.0 40
2.00 tbs Salad Dressing, blue cheese 2.3 0 2.3 16.0 1.5 154
2.00 tbs Salad Dressing, caesar 0.6 0.1 0.5 10.5 2.8 107
2.00 tbs Salad Dressing, Italian 3.0 0 3.0 14.2 0.2 137
2.00 tbs Salad Dressing, ranch 1.4 0 1.4 11.3 0.9 109
2.00 tbs Salad Dressing, thousandisland 4.8 0 4.8 11.2 0.3 118
1.00 tsp Sesame Oil 0.0 0 0.0 4.5 0.0 40

TOFU
8.00 fl oz Soy Milk 4.4 3.2 1.2 4.7 6.7 81
4.00 oz-wt Tofu, firm 4.9 2.6 2.2 9.9 17.9 164
4.00 oz-wt Tofu, silken 3.3 0.1 3.2 3.1 5.4 62

BEANS
0.50 cup Baby Lima Beans 21.2 7.0 14.2 0.3 7.3 115
0.50 cup Black Beans 20.4 7.5 12.9 0.5 7.6 114
0.50 cup Blackeyed Peas 17.9 5.6 12.3 0.5 6.6 100
0.50 cup CA Red Kidney Beans 19.8 8.2 11.6 0.1 8.1 110
0.50 cup Chickpea/Garbanzo Beans 22.5 6.2 16.2 2.1 7.3 134
0.50 cup Great Northern Beans 18.7 6.2 12.5 0.4 7.4 104
2.00 tbs Hummos/Hummus 6.2 1.6 4.6 2.6 1.5 53
0.50 cup Lentils 19.9 7.8 12.1 0.4 8.9 115
0.50 cup Navy Beans 23.9 5.8 18.1 0.5 7.9 129
0.50 cup Pink Beans 23.6 4.5 19.1 0.4 7.7 126
0.50 cup Pinto Beans 18.0 7.0 11.0 1.0 7.0 110
0.50 cup Soybeans 9.9 3.8 6.2 5.8 11.1 127

NUTS & SEEDS
2.00 tbs Almond Butter 6.8 1.2 5.6 18.9 4.8 203
2.00 tbs Almonds, slivered 3.3 1.6 1.7 8.6 3.5 102
2.00 tbs Almonds, whole 3.6 2.2 1.4 8.9 3.7 106
6.00 each Chestnuts, roasted 26.7 2.6 24.2 1.1 1.6 124
2.00 tbs Hazelnuts, Chopped 2.4 1.4 1.0 8.7 2.1 90
2.00 tbs Hazelnuts, Whole 2.8 1.6 1.2 10.3 2.5 106
2.00 tbs Macadamia Nuts 2.3 1.4 0.9 12.7 1.3 120
2.00 tbs Peanut Butter, natural 6.9 2.1 4.8 15.9 7.7 187
2.00 tbs Peanut Butter, regular 6.2 1.9 4.3 16.3 8.1 190
2.00 tbs Peanuts 3.4 1.7 1.8 8.9 4.7 105
2.00 tbs Pecans, chopped 2.1 1.4 0.6 10.7 1.4 103
2.00 tbs Pine Nuts 2.4 0.8 1.7 8.6 4.1 96
2.00 tbs Pistachio Nuts 4.7 1.6 3.1 6.9 3.3 88
2.00 tbs Pumpkin Seeds 3.1 0.7 2.4 7.9 4.2 93
2.00 tbs Sunflower Seeds 3.4 1.9 1.5 8.9 4.1 103
2.00 tbs Walnuts, chopped 2.1 1.0 1.1 9.8 2.3 98
2.00 tbs Walnuts, halves 1.7 0.8 0.9 8.2 1.9 82

BAKING PRODUCTS
2.00 tbs All Purpose White Flour 11.9 0.4 11.5 0.2 1.6 57
1.00 tsp Atkins Thicken/Thin 1.5 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 6
1.00 oz-wt Baking Chocolate,unsweetened 8.0 4.4 3.7 15.7 2.9 148
0.50 tsp Baking Powder 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 1
0.50 tsp Baking Soda 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
2.00 tbs Chocolate Chips, semisweet 13.3 1.2 12.0 6.3 0.9 101
0.50 tsp Cinnamon 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 3
0.50 tsp Cocoa Powder, unsweetened 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.2 3
2.00 tbs Coconut Milk-Canned 0.8 0.3 0.5 6.0 0.6 56
2.00 tbs Coconut, dried, unsweetened 2.4 1.6 0.8 6.3 0.7 64
2.00 tbs Cornmeal 13.4 1.3 12.1 0.3 1.5 63
1.00 each Gelatin, unsweetened 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 23
1.00 tsp Ghee 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.2 0.0 37
1.00 tsp Margarine 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0 34
1.00 tbs Molasses 12.5 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 48
1.00 tsp Sugar, brown 4.5 0.0 4.5 0.0 0.0 17
1.00 tsp Sugar, white 4.2 0.0 4.2 0.0 0.0 16

GRAINS
0.50 cup Bulgur Wheat-Cooked 16.9 4.1 12.8 0.2 2.8 76
2.00 tbs Cornmeal 11.7 1.1 10.6 0.5 1.2 55
0.50 cup Couscous-Cooked 18.2 1.1 17.1 0.1 3.0 88
0.50 cup Hominy-Cooked 11.8 2.1 9.7 0.7 1.2 59
0.50 cup Kasha-Cooked 74.3 9.4 64.8 2.7 11.6 343
0.50 cup Millet-Cooked 28.4 1.6 26.8 1.2 4.2 143
2.00 tbs Oat Bran-Dry 7.8 1.8 6.0 0.8 2.0 29
0.50 cup Pearled Barley-Cooked 22.2 3.0 19.2 0.3 1.8 97
0.25 cup Quinoa Grain-Dry 29.3 2.5 26.8 2.5 5.6 159
0.50 cup Rice, brown, cooked 22.4 1.8 20.6 0.9 2.5 108
0.50 cup Rice, white, cooked 22.3 0.3 21.9 0.2 2.1 103
0.50 cup Rice, wild, cooked 17.5 1.5 16.0 0.3 3.3 83
2.00 tbs Wheat Germ-Toasted 7.0 1.8 5.2 1.5 4.1 54

CEREALS
1.00 cup Corn Flakes 24.2 0.8 23.4 0.2 1.8 102
0.50 cup Cream of Rice Cereal-Cooked 13.9 0.1 13.8 0.1 1.1 63
0.50 cup Cream of Wheat -Cooked 15.8 1.4 14.3 0.2 2.2 77
0.50 cup Oatmeal-Cooked 12.6 2.0 10.6 1.2 3.0 73
1.00 cup Puffed Wheat Cereal 11.1 0.6 10.5 0.2 2.1 51
1.00 cup Raisin Bran 47.1 8.2 38.9 1.5 5.6 186
1.00 cup Rice Krispies 22.8 0.3 22.5 0.3 1.7 100

PASTA
0.50 cup Noodles, egg, cooked 19.9 0.9 19.0 1.2 3.8 106
0.50 cup Pasta, spinach, cooked 18.3 2.5 15.9 0.4 3.2 91
0.50 cup Pasta, whole wheat, cooked 18.6 2.0 16.6 0.4 3.7 87
0.50 cup Pasta/Noodles, dry, cooked 19.8 1.2 18.6 0.5 3.3 99
4.00 oz-wt Pasta/Noodles, fresh, cooked 28.3 2.0 26.3 1.2 5.8 149

BREADS, ROLLS &
CRACKERS
1.00 each Bagel, 2 1/2 oz 38.0 1.7 36.3 1.1 7.5 195
1.00 each Biscuit, 2 oz 27.6 1.0 26.6 6.9 4.2 191
1.00 each Blueberry Muffin, 2 oz 27.4 1.5 25.9 3.7 3.1 158
1.00 each Bran Muffin, 2 oz 23.8 4.0 19.8 7.3 4.0 164
1.00 each Breadsticks, sesame, small 2.2 0.1 2.1 0.5 0.4 15
1.00 each Corn Muffin, 2 oz 29.0 1.9 27.1 4.8 3.4 174
1.00 piece Cornbread 2.5 x 2.5 x 1.5 pce 22.7 1.9 20.7 4.9 4.0 152
5.00 each Crackers, butter-type 51.4 1.5 49.8 18.3 5.8 393
5.00 each Crackers, rye wafers 44.2 12.6 31.6 0.5 5.3 184
5.00 each Crackers, saltines 10.7 0.5 10.3 1.8 1.4 65
5.00 each Crackers, water 10.0 0.6 9.4 0.0 1.3 44
1.00 each Croissant 27.0 0.0 27.0 17.0 4.0 270
1.00 each English Muffin 26.0 1.5 24.5 1.0 4.4 133
1.00 each Hard White Roll 30.0 1.3 28.7 2.5 5.6 167
1.00 piece Italian Bread 15.0 0.8 14.2 1.1 2.6 81
1.00 each Pita Pocket Bread, 6
1/2"diameter
33.4 1.3 32.1 0.7 5.5 165
1.00 each Popover 10.4 0.3 10.1 1.5 2.6 67
1.00 piece Pumpernickel Bread 12.4 1.7 10.7 0.8 2.3 65
1.00 piece Raisin Bread 13.6 1.1 12.5 1.1 2.1 71
1.00 piece Rye Bread 15.5 1.9 13.6 1.1 2.7 83
1.00 each Soft Hoagie Roll 32.0 2.0 30.0 4.5 7.0 200
1.00 piece Sourdough Bread 13.0 0.8 12.2 0.8 2.2 69
1.00 each Tortilla, corn 12.1 1.4 10.8 0.7 1.5 58
1.00 each Tortillas, flour, 8" 25.3 0.0 25.3 3.1 4.4 146
1.00 piece Wheat Bread 11.8 1.1 10.7 1.0 2.3 65
1.00 piece White Bread 14.9 0.7 14.2 1.1 2.5 80
1.00 piece Whole grain bread 11.8 1.1 10.7 1.0 2.3 65

PANCAKES, WAFFLES &
FRENCH TOAST
1.00 piece French Toast-Frozen 18.9 0.7 18.3 3.6 4.4 126
1.00 each Pancakes-Frozen-Ready ToEat-6 inch 31.8 1.3 30.5 2.4 3.8 167
1.00 each Pancakes-Homemade 6" 21.8 1.1 20.7 7.5 4.9 175
1.00 each Waffles-Frozen-4" square 13.5 0.8 12.7 2.7 2.1 88
1.00 each Waffles-Homemade-7" diam 24.7 1.1 23.6 10.6 5.9 218

GRAVIES & SAUCES
2.00 tbs Barbecue Sauce 4.0 0.4 3.6 0.6 0.6 23
0.25 cup Gravy, au jus 1.5 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.7 10
0.25 cup Gravy, canned (chicken, beef, turkey, etc) 3.2 0.2 3.0 3.4 1.1 47
2.00 tbs Hollandaise Sauce 0.3 0.0 0.3 9.1 1.0 85
0.25 cup Spaghetti/Marinara Sauce 5.1 1.0 4.1 1.3 0.9 36
0.25 cup Sweet & Sour Sauce 15.1 0.1 15.1 0.0 0.2 59
2.00 tbs Tartar Sauce 1.2 0.1 1.1 16.4 0.4 149
2.00 tbs Teriyaki Sauce 5.7 0.0 5.7 0.0 2.1 30
0.25 cup Tomato Sauce 4.4 0.9 3.5 0.1 0.8 18

ALCOHOL
12.00 fl oz Beer 13.2 0.7 12.5 0.0 1.1 146
1.00 fl oz Bourbon-80 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64
1.00 oz-wt Brandy-86 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 71
1.00 oz-wt Brandy-86 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 71
1.00 oz-wt Gin-80 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65
4.00 fl oz Medium White Wine 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.1 80
4.00 fl oz Red Wine 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0.2 85
1.00 oz-wt Rum-80 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65
1.00 oz-wt Tequila-80 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65
1.00 oz-wt Triple Sec Liqueur-1 Shot 12.5 0.0 12.5 0.1 0.0 100
1.00 oz-wt Vodka-80 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65
1.00 oz-wt Whiskey-80 Proof 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65

MISC.
1.00 each Atkins-Low Carb Tortilla 12.0 9.0 3.0 2.0 5.0 60
2.00 tbs Chicken Liver Pate-Canned 1.7 0.0 1.7 3.4 3.5 52

DESSERTS & PASTRIES
1.00 piece Cake, angelfood, 1/12 cake 29.4 0.1 29.2 0.2 3.1 129
1.00 piece Cake, chocolate layer, 3 ozslice 38.0 2.0 36.0 16.0 2.0 300
1.00 piece Cake, coffeecake, 2 oz slice 29.6 0.7 28.9 5.4 3.1 178
1.00 piece Cake, pound cake, 1 oz slice 13.8 0.1 13.7 5.6 1.6 110
1.00 oz-wt Chocolate, dark 17.9 1.7 16.2 8.5 1.2 136
1.00 oz-wt Chocolate, milk 16.8 1.0 15.8 8.7 2.0 145
1.00 each Cookie, chocolate chip, 1/2 oz 10.3 0.2 10.0 4.1 0.9 79
1.00 each Cookie, oatmeal, 1/2 oz 12.4 0.5 11.9 3.3 1.1 81
1.00 each Cookie, peanut butter, 2/3 oz 11.8 0.4 11.4 4.8 1.8 95
1.00 each Cookie, sugar, 1/2 oz 10.2 0.1 10.1 3.2 0.8 72
1.00 each Doughnut, glazed 26.6 0.7 25.9 13.7 3.8 242
1.00 each Doughnut, plain 19.0 1.0 18.0 11.0 3.0 180
0.50 cup Ice cream, chocolate 18.6 0.8 17.8 7.3 2.5 143
0.50 cup Ice cream, fruit 18.2 0.2 18.0 5.5 2.1 127
0.50 cup Ice cream, vanilla 15.6 0.0 15.6 7.3 2.3 133
1.00 piece Pie, apple, 1/8 of 9" pie 57.5 2.2 55.3 19.4 3.7 411
1.00 piece Pie, cherry, 1/8 of 9" pie 69.3 2.7 66.6 22.0 5.0 486
1.00 piece Pie, lemon meringue, 1/6 of 8"pie 53.3 1.4 52.0 9.8 1.7 303
1.00 piece Pie, pecan, 1/8 of 9" pie 63.7 6.1 57.6 27.1 6.0 503
1.00 piece Pie, pumpkin, 1/8 of 9" pie 40.9 4.2 36.7 14.4 7.0 316

SNACKS
10.00 piece Potato Chips 10.6 0.9 9.7 6.9 1.4 107
10.00 piece Pretzels 47.5 1.9 45.6 2.1 5.5 229
0.50 oz-wt Soy Nuts 4.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 6.0 60
10.00 piece Tortilla Chips 11.3 1.2 10.2 4.7 1.3 90

SOUPS
1.00 cup Broth, beef 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.4 4.8 38
1.00 cup Broth, chicken 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 3.1 31
1.00 cup Soup, black bean 19.8 4.4 15.4 1.5 5.6 116
1.00 cup Soup, chicken noodle 9.4 0.7 8.6 2.5 4.0 75
1.00 cup Soup, cream of potato 17.2 0.5 16.7 6.4 5.8 149
1.00 cup Soup, cream of tomato 22.3 2.7 19.6 6.0 6.1 161
1.00 cup Soup, minestrone 11.2 1.0 10.3 2.5 4.3 82
1.00 cup Soup, New England clam chowder 16.6 1.5 15.1 6.6 9.5 164
1.00 cup Soup, onion 8.2 1.0 7.2 1.7 3.8 58
1.00 cup Soup, vegetable 19.0 1.2 17.8 3.7 3.5 122

CONDIMENTS
1.00 tsp Atkins low carb jam 0.3 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 3
1.00 tbs Balsamic Vinegar 2.3 0.0 2.3 0.0 0.1 10
1.00 tbs Capers 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 2
1.00 tsp Chili Powder 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.3 8
1.00 tbs Cider Vinegar 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 2
2.00 tbs Cranberry Sauce 13.5 0.3 13.1 0.1 0.1 52
1.00 tsp Cumin 0.8 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.4 9
1.00 tsp Dijon Mustard 0.6 0.1 0.5 0.5 0.3 6
1.00 each Dill Pickle 2.7 0.8 1.9 0.1 0.4 12
1.00 tsp Fish Sauce 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.3 2
1.00 each Garlic 1.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 0.2 4
1.00 tbs Ginger, Root Slices 0.9 0.1 0.8 0.0 0.1 4
1.00 tsp Honey 5.8 0.0 5.8 0.0 0.0 21
1.00 tsp Horseradish-Prepared 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.1 2
1.00 tsp Jam 4.6 0.1 4.5 0.0 0.0 19
1.00 tsp Jelly 4.5 0.1 4.4 0.0 0.0 18
1.00 tbs Ketchup/Catsup 4.2 0.2 4.0 0.1 0.2 16
1.00 tbs Maple Syrup 13.4 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 52
1.00 tbs Miso Paste 3.0 0.4 2.6 0.8 1.9 27
5.00 each Olives, black 1.4 0.7 0.7 2.3 0.2 25
5.00 each Olives, green 2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 0.0 50
1.00 tbs Pesto Sauce 1.0 0.4 0.6 7.1 2.8 78
1.00 tbs Pickle Relish 5.4 0.2 5.2 0.1 0.1 20
1.00 tsp Preserves 4.6 0.1 4.5 0.0 0.0 19
1.00 tbs Red Wine Vinegar 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
1.00 tbs Rice Vinegar, seasoned 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 12
1.00 tbs Salsa, green 0.6 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.2 4
1.00 tbs Salsa, red 0.8 0.1 0.7 0.0 0.1 4
1.00 tbs Sherry vinegar 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 2
1.00 tbs Soy sauce 1.0 0.1 0.9 0.0 1.9 11
1.00 tbs Soy Sauce-Low Sodium 1.4 0.1 1.2 0.0 0.8 8
1.00 tbs Tahini 3.2 0.7 2.5 8.0 2.6 89
1.00 tbs White Wine Vinegar 1.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.0 5
1.00 tsp Worcestershire Sauce 0.9 0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0 4

HERBS
1.00 tbs Basil, fresh 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1
1.00 tbs Chives, fresh 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 1
1.00 tbs Cilantro (Chinese Parsley) 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 1
1.00 tbs Dill, fresh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
1.00 tbs Parsley, fresh 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 1

FRUIT & FRUIT JUICES
1.00 each Apple, medium 21.0 3.7 17.3 0.5 0.3 81
0.25 cup Applesauce 6.9 0.7 6.2 0.0 0.1 26
0.25 cup Apricots, dried 24.9 3.6 21.3 0.2 1.5 96
1.00 each Apricots, fresh 3.9 0.8 3.1 0.1 0.5 17
1.00 each Avocado 14.9 10.1 4.8 30.8 4.0 324
1.00 each Banana, small 23.7 2.4 21.2 0.5 1.0 93
0.25 cup Blackberries 4.6 1.9 2.7 0.1 0.3 19
0.25 cup Blueberries 5.1 1.0 4.1 0.1 0.2 20
0.25 cup Cantaloupe 3.3 0.3 3.0 0.1 0.4 14
0.25 cup Cherries 4.8 0.7 4.2 0.3 0.4 21
0.25 cup Cranberries, raw 3.0 1.0 2.0 0.0 0.1 12
0.25 cup Currants, dried 26.7 2.4 24.2 0.1 1.5 102
0.25 cup Dates, chopped 32.7 3.3 29.4 0.2 0.9 122
0.25 cup Figs, dried 32.5 5.8 26.7 0.6 1.5 127
1.00 each Figs, fresh 9.6 1.7 7.9 0.2 0.4 37
0.50 each Grapefruit Juice-Canned-Unsweetened-Cup 9.2 1.4 7.9 0.1 0.7 37
0.25 cup Grapes 7.1 0.4 6.7 0.2 0.3 28
0.25 cup Honeydew Melon 3.9 0.3 3.6 0.0 0.2 15
0.50 cup Juice, apple 14.5 0.1 14.4 0.1 0.1 58
0.50 cup Juice, cranberry 18.2 0.1 18.1 0.1 0.0 72
0.50 cup Juice, grape 18.9 0.1 18.8 0.1 0.7 77
0.50 cup Juice, grapefruit 11.1 0.1 10.9 0.1 0.6 47
1.00 tbs Juice, lemon 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.0 0.1 4
1.00 tbs Juice, lime 1.4 0.1 1.3 0.0 0.1 4
0.50 cup Juice, orange 13.4 0.2 13.2 0.1 0.8 56
0.50 cup Juice, tomato 5.1 0.5 4.7 0.1 0.9 21
1.00 each Kiwifruit 11.3 2.6 8.7 0.3 0.8 46
0.25 cup Mango 7.0 0.7 6.3 0.1 0.2 27
1.00 each Nectarine 16.0 2.2 13.8 0.6 1.3 67
1.00 each Orange 16.3 3.4 12.9 0.1 1.4 64
0.25 cup Papaya 3.4 0.6 2.8 0.0 0.2 14
1.00 each Peach, medium 10.9 2.0 8.9 0.1 0.7 42
1.00 each Pear, medium 25.1 4.0 21.1 0.7 0.6 98
0.25 cup Pineapple 4.8 0.5 4.3 0.2 0.2 19
1.00 each Plums 8.6 1.0 7.6 0.4 0.5 36
0.25 cup Prunes 26.7 3.0 23.6 0.2 1.1 102
0.25 cup Raspberries 3.6 2.1 1.5 0.2 0.3 15
0.25 cup Seedless Raisins 32.6 1.7 31.0 0.2 1.3 124
0.25 cup Strawberries 2.7 0.9 1.8 0.1 0.2 11
1.00 each Tangerine 7.8 1.6 6.2 0.1 0.4 31
0.25 cup Watermelon 2.8 0.2 2.6 0.2 0.2 12

VEGETABLES
1.00 each Artichoke 13.4 6.5 6.9 0.2 4.2 60
1.00 each Artichoke hearts, marinated 1.0 0.0 1.0 2.5 0.0 25
6.00 each Asparagus spears 3.8 1.4 2.4 0.3 2.3 22
0.50 cup Beans, green 4.9 2.0 2.9 0.2 1.2 22
1.00 cup Bok Choi 1.5 0.7 0.8 0.1 1.1 9
0.50 cup Broccoflower 3.1 1.6 1.5 0.2 1.5 16
0.50 cup Broccoli 3.9 2.3 1.7 0.3 2.3 22
0.50 cup Broccoli rabe 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 1.3 10
6.00 each Brussels sprouts 10.9 3.3 7.6 0.6 3.2 49
0.50 cup Cabbage, green 1.9 0.8 1.1 0.1 0.4 8
0.50 cup Cabbage, red 1.9 0.8 1.1 0.1 0.5 9
0.50 cup Cabbage, sauerkraut 5.1 3.0 2.1 0.2 1.1 22
0.50 cup Cabbage, savoy 2.1 1.1 1.1 0.0 0.7 9
1.00 each Carrots, medium 7.3 2.2 5.1 0.1 0.7 31
6.00 each Cauliflower 4.4 2.9 1.5 0.5 2.0 25
1.00 each Celery stalk 1.5 0.7 0.8 0.1 0.3 6
1.00 tbs Celery, chopped 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 1
1.00 each Chili Pepper 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20
1.00 tbs Chilies, green, chopped 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 3
4.00 oz-wt Collards 7.3 4.1 3.2 0.4 3.1 37
0.50 cup Corn 16.0 2.0 14.1 0.4 2.3 66
1.00 each Cucumber, English 4.0 1.1 2.8 0.3 0.9 19
0.50 each Cucumber, small 2.5 0.7 1.8 0.2 0.6 12
0.50 cup Daikon 1.8 0.7 1.1 0.0 0.3 8
0.50 cup Eggplant 3.3 1.2 2.0 0.1 0.4 14
0.50 cup Eggplant, Italian 3.3 1.2 2.0 0.1 0.4 14
0.50 cup Endive 1.8 1.4 0.4 0.0 0.4 8
0.50 cup Escarole 0.8 0.8 0.1 0.1 0.3 4
0.50 cup Fenned 3.2 1.3 1.8 0.1 0.5 13
1.00 cup Greens, mixed 1.6 1.2 0.4 0.1 0.9 9
0.50 cup Jicama 5.7 3.2 2.5 0.1 0.5 25
0.50 cup Kale 3.7 1.3 2.4 0.3 1.2 18
1.00 each Leeks 12.6 1.6 11.0 0.3 1.3 54
1.00 cup Lettuce, butterhead 1.3 0.6 0.7 0.1 0.7 7
1.00 cup Lettuce, romaine 1.3 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.9 8
0.50 cup Mushroom, potobello 1.4 0.4 1.0 0.1 1.0 9
2.00 tbs Mushrooms, dried 8.9 2.9 6.0 0.7 5.6 64
0.50 cup Mushrooms, fresh 1.4 0.4 1.0 0.1 1.0 9
4.00 oz-wt Okra 7.5 2.5 5.0 0.3 1.9 34
1.00 each Onions 9.5 2.0 7.5 0.2 1.3 42
0.25 cup Onions, green 1.8 0.7 1.2 0.0 0.5 8
0.50 cup Peas, edible podded 5.6 2.2 3.4 0.2 2.6 34
0.50 cup Peas, green 9.9 3.4 6.5 0.3 3.8 55
0.50 cup Pepper, green 4.8 1.3 3.4 0.1 0.7 20
0.50 cup Pepper, red 4.8 1.5 3.3 0.1 0.7 20
1.00 each Peppers, jalapeno 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.2 4
0.50 each Peppers, roasted 2.4 0.4 2.0 0.1 0.3 10
1.00 each Potato, sweet 22.4 3.1 19.2 0.1 1.8 95
0.50 cup Potato, white 15.4 1.5 13.9 0.1 1.4 66
0.50 cup Pumpkin 9.9 3.6 6.3 0.3 1.3 42
0.50 cup Radicchio 0.9 0.2 0.7 0.1 0.3 5
6.00 each Radishes 1.0 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.2 5
0.50 cup Rhubarb 2.8 1.1 1.7 0.1 0.5 13
0.25 cup Shallots 6.7 0.3 6.4 0.0 1.0 29
1.00 cup Spinach, raw 1.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.9 7
0.50 cup Squash, acorn 14.9 4.5 10.4 0.1 1.1 57
0.50 cup Squash, butternut 10.8 2.9 7.9 0.1 0.9 41
0.50 cup Squash, spaghetti 5.0 1.1 3.9 0.2 0.5 21
0.50 cup Squash, summer 2.5 1.1 1.4 0.1 0.7 11
1.00 each Squash, zucchini 5.7 2.4 3.3 0.3 2.3 27
0.50 cup Swiss chard 0.7 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.3 3
1.00 each Tomatillos 2.0 0.6 1.3 0.3 0.3 11
1.00 each Tomato, plum 4.2 1.0 3.2 0.3 0.8 19
1.00 each Tomato, small 4.2 1.0 3.2 0.3 0.8 19
0.50 cup Tomatoes, canned 5.2 1.2 4.0 0.2 1.1 23
6.00 each Tomatoes, cherry 4.7 1.1 3.6 0.3 0.9 21
0.50 cup Tomatoes, chopped 3.5 0.8 2.6 0.2 0.6 16
0.25 cup Tomatoes, sun dried, oilpacked 6.4 1.6 4.8 3.9 1.4 59
0.50 cup Turnips 3.8 1.6 2.3 0.1 0.6 16
0.50 cup Waterchestnuts 8.7 1.8 7.0 0.0 0.6 35
0.50 cup Watercress 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.4 2

Jo takk... Har boken i norsk versjon allerede (Atkins Carb-counter og Den Store Slankerevolusjonen). Produkter jeg er i tvil om hva inneholder, leser jeg innholdsfortegnelsen på eller holder meg unna  :deal:

Det var ikke meningen å være negativ annet enn overfor Statens Ernæringsråd.

Nei, de oppgitte mengdene av karbohydrater i Matvaretabellen er selvfølgelig uten fiber som ikke gir energi.
(Pus, dette var svar til en "Bad" og heller ikke ment negativt  ;)).

Okay, då.... ::blush::




Søndagsklem til alle ::biggrin::

Hei, er det noen som har en oppskritf eller formel på atkinsen dietten

A ≤ ∑(⅔F - K + ⅓P)